Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim McLeod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jim McLeod

Jim McLeod (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No google search hits for this Jim Mcleod. Fails WP:BIO Sasha Callahan 01:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Non notable. However, I disagree with the nomination reasoning per WP:GHITS. - Rjd0060 02:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Please note that WP:GHITS is an essay, not a policy. Useight 04:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Reply: Yes, I already knew that but it is still a valid point. - Rjd0060 00:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Renee 02:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I've found evidence, in Google Books, to suggest the subject testified in a criminal case Regina v. Robert Simpson. As I'm only seeing snippets of the book, I'm not sure how big the case was or of the subject's role.--Sethacus 03:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - NN. Spawn Man 03:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of notability Bfigura (talk) 03:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm now filled with curiosity as to why a radio station transmission script (or transcript) was filed in a criminal case, but it does not seem notable in any significant way. --Dhartung | Talk 06:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No one has ever made a serious attempt to record the story of broadcasting in Saskatchewan, but if they had, Jim McLeod would have appeared prominently as the first face and first voice to ever appear on Saskatchewan television screens, not to mention his enormous viewership. But since I now understand the one source I could find to attribute this isn't enough, then it might as well go. Brithgob 23:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.