Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Luckman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:35 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Luckman

Not notable and therefore unverifiable. 0 Google hits for Jim Luckman "unknown show" -- JamesTeterenko 02:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete unless someone can provide a reference establishing notability. Pburka 02:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. If the Unknown Show is such a smash hit, why does it not pick up relevant Google hits? Non notable. CanadianCaesar 02:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Non-notability does not imply unverifiability. One can verify an article that states that 1679+22=1701, for example. Unverifiability makes questions of notability moot, of course. Since this Jim Luckman is unverifiable (I cannot find anything, either, and this biographical article cites no sources, of course.), the question of his notability does not arise. Delete. Uncle G 03:40, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
I believe that for a biography, non-notability does cause anything more than a stub to be unverifiable without original research. I agree that this implication is not true for all potential articles and I will be more careful in my wording in future VfD nominations. I prefer putting both reasons in the nomination because I want the reasoning to hold true even if someone was able to verify the unimportant information. -- JamesTeterenko 20:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. — mark ✎ 08:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 10:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unless proven notable.-Poli 19:40, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
  • Delete nn vanity. A "hit" on public access?? --Etacar11 23:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.