Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Golden: Guitarist, Radio Personality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Golden: Guitarist, Radio Personality

Jim Golden: Guitarist, Radio Personality (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Autobiography with little claim to meeting WP:BIO. First several pages of non-wiki ghits don't show notability for this Jim Golden. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 15:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Nothing notable about achieving National recognition and having a CD in international release. Nothing notable about winning three world wide music contests. -- (comment added by IP user 70.191.240.74)
  • Delete. Lots of clutter that shows he is constantly surrounded by notable people, but nothing to show notability of his own. The article is also poorly written. --Blanchardb 15:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Stated by someone who would not know poorly written if it bit him. -- (comment added by IP user 70.191.240.74)

There are some real garbage articles on this site. This article is not one of them. Opinions are like belly buttons. Everyone body has one. Let the general public judge for itself. Clean up your own site before criticizing an article belonging to someone else.

  • Delete as written, doesn't pass WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as failing WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:N, WP:MUSIC, WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and WP:RS. The page has already been userfied, so no long-term harm will be done by deletion. I'm sure he's a good man, a fine father, and a Christian, but music ministers of this ilk are very common, and his hagiography does not belong on WP. Bearian 19:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
No claims are made for anyone being a minister in the article. You may try reading it next time before venturing an opinion. -- (comment added by IP user 70.191.240.74)

Hagiography???? You must have dug deep in the thesaurus for that one. Article shows no mention of individual being a minister at any time. It seems he has accomplished much in his life and deserves a page like this one.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.