Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Ether

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Ether

Jim Ether (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable filmmaker. Google search on name brings back only 185 unique on 3260, mostly blog, forum, and YouTube links. Filmmaker's project Alert does have a new IMDB page, but Gsearch on ("Jim Ether" Alert) brings back only 100 unique on 663 hits, none major or non-trivial. Delete. MikeWazowski 18:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep He seems notable enough. I found an independent source [1] Valoem ^talk 18:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Your independent source is a user post on a user-posted video site. Possibly a copyright violation too Bwithh 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete There are thousands of people making flash videos. No indications this one's notable. Fan-1967 19:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Has only one entry on IMDB, and google searching brings back unotable results.Ryanpostlethwaite 19:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. IMDB entries are not that difficult to get Bwithh 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. TheRealFennShysa 19:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Is the request for deletion considered due to the fact that the article is too elaborate for the person? If you're going to use Google hits as a reason for deletion, then make sure you remove this page: Ayman Rifai and pages like it as well. This is one of the thousands of stubbed biography pages. Only 129 unique hits! Delete! Delete! I worked on this page, so I don't know if my opinion or vote even counts. Bonusbox 02:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete YEAH! GET ME OFFA HERE! I DON'T DO SHIT! jim ether 20:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC) — 71.162.104.203 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• delete as per subject's request. 38.100.34.2 01:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, whose research indicates a lack of verifiability. Mangojuice^talk 03:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.