Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Dawg (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 02:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Dawg

Jim Dawg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. No reliable sources in article (source given is a social networking site). Gsearch for "Jim Dawg" + rap or rapper does not come up with sources demonstrating notability -- someone who had their biggest selling EP in 2002 should be coming up with ghits if notable. Contested prod. Fabrictramp (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Additional note: I see this has been through AfD before, with the same problems. Could also be eligible for speedy as recreation of deleted material; salting may be something to consider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabrictramp (talk • contribs) 23:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• speedy delete this spammy puffery. Springnuts (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't see the previous version, but of course G4 may apply as well if this version is largely identical to that one. JavaTenor (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Does appear to be nearly word-for-word of the deleted page, created by the same user who created it. DMacks (talk) 23:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Fry this spam in a skillet. Wryspy (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.