Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigyasubalak's Law

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 03:51, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jigyasubalak's Law

Law-vanity. --W(t) 20:39, 2005 May 17 (UTC)

• Delete Messageboardcruft, O Google Hits Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:53, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Stancel 21:11, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I thought I remembered seeing that name somewhere this morning. Here are the relevant Slashdot posts: [1], [2]. This was a one-off gag term coined by a Slashdot poster deep in comments less than twenty-four hours ago. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 00:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, although it's nice to know that we're only a few decades away from growing a diamond bigger than the earth. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:26, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
  • Shhhh Keep quiet about that, or else every solar system will want a giant diamond too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:51, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Vanity. --metta, The Sunborn 06:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.