Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewfro.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jewfro.org

Nonnotable; vanity -- 165 google hits for "jewfro.org", 151 not from Wikipedia. The page doesn't cite any of its claims of media attention; it itself says "Strangely, it is quite a feat to find any record of these today", very suspiciously. --Adam Atlas 16:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• I think we can safely lose this one. Delete. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Bellow being non-notable. Pavel Vozenilek 17:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable and no citing of the claims. Chris Kreider 17:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ---Charles 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nowhere near the independent sources needed to pass WP:WEB. Thankfully.-- danntm ^T _C 19:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, nn website. Seraphimblade 21:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Seraphimblade. Danny Lilithborne 23:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. ---Anomo 12:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The following votes were posted by users who have only made edits related to jewfro.org, and therefore may be sock puppets or single-purpose accounts:

• Keep Perhaps if content was edited more closely, it is a humourous website---Marykath (Contributions) 11:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Humourousness is not a criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Adam Atlas 15:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I agree it is a humourous webiste, and the facts that can not be proven can be simply deleted or verified by e-mailing the owner of the site TxFcPoon (Contributions) 11:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • "Verifying" facts by emailing the owner of the website constitutes original research, which is against Wikipedia policy. --Adam Atlas 15:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.