Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus juice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to 2005 trial of Michael Jackson. - ulayiti (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus juice

Jesus Juice was nominated for deletion on 2005-07-13. The result of the discussion was "delete". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Juice.

• Note - The contents of Jesus juice are not the same as the deleted one, which consisted of patent nonsense, so this is not a G4 speedy.

Michael Jackson trial-cruft - apparently there is such a thing. This is a non-notable neologism with no encyclopedic value, IMO. This could possibly be mentioned in 2005 trial of Michael Jackson, but if not, no loss. Delete. GTBacchus^(talk) 07:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Dbchip 09:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 09:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge as second option, per below. -- Saberwyn.
• Delete to get Jesus Juice, the holy refreshment! Sceptre ^(Talk) 14:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. 134,000 results for "Jesus juice" on google. [1] I think that warrents keeping it. Trilemma 16:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Jesus juice is a term Michael Jackson is alledged to call white wine (sic) - Who cares? Not encyclopedic (sp.?). --kingboyk 16:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into 2005 trial of Michael Jackson. I've heard the neologism used often enough that it appears to be here to stay, but I can't see it sustaining an article of its own. --Aaron 18:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge. I agree with Aaron's reasoning. -- Mikeblas 19:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as per above Dustimagic 20:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above suggestions into something related to Michael Jackson. This term is very notable. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 23:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or failing that, I will agree to Merge to form consensus. This shouldn't deserve its own article, though. Eusebeus 03:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Waste to space and time! --161.74.11.24 19:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.