This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Ryan Delaneytalk 11:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Being the relation of a notable preson does not make a person notable. Sonic Mew | talk to me 22:46, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
Delete non-notable, vanity possible -Soltak 23:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete or Speedy. There are a few notable-by-relation cases (first ladies, etc.) but this sure isn't one of them. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:39, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
Delete If she herself was notable, then yes but this is vanity --Dysepsion 23:43, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 00:51, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.