Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Rowling Arantes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to J.K. Rowling. Sr13 is almost Singularity 08:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jessica Rowling Arantes

Jessica Rowling Arantes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

J.K. Rowling's 14-year-old daughter. She hasn't done anything to be notable in her own right. NawlinWiki 04:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and Merge Agreed she has done nothing except for being J.K. Rowling's daughter. That falls under WP:NOTINHERITED. Gorkymalorki 04:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Be aware that under the GFDL "merge and delete" are not permissible. If we merge we maintain the article history. --Dhartung | Talk 06:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Sorry guess I meant to say Delete and Redirect, although I do not know how the GFDL pertains to that. If you would like to explain please do so on my talk page so as to not clutter WP:AFD. Gorkymalorki 07:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Neither Jessica nor her mother have taken any action which would bring Jessica into the public eye in her own right. --Metropolitan90 05:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to J.K. Rowling. Pretty clear-cut case of a non-notable relative of a celebrity. —Cuiviénen 05:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, then redirect to mother's article. Nothing here worth salvaging, sufficient material already in other article. --Dhartung | Talk 06:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete being a child of a celebrity doesn't cut it whatsoever. Jmlk17 06:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Jmlk. Oysterguitarist 07:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to the mother that has done something. Merge/source any pertinent biographical information into that article. -- saberwyn 11:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Subject does not meet the requirements for WP:Notability. Simply because her mother is quite possibly one of the most successful writers of recent times does not extend her mother's notability to her. Ozgod 12:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect. Notability is not inherited. --Targeman 14:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No notability in her own right. --Belovedfreak 15:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing at all outside being her mother's daughter to indicate notability. Not sure if a redirect is really necessary. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to the J.K's article, that looks obvious.--JForget 23:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete She has done nothing of note and notability is not inherited. I have privacy concerns too as a child who is not a public figure and is relatively unknown should be allowed to grow up without her childhood being documented. WP:BLP says the presumption should be in favor of privacy and I think that's true here. --Malcolmxl5 17:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.