Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse and the Rippers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jesse and the Rippers

Jesse and the Rippers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Full House by itself is, in fact, notable; however, notability is not inherited. This article hasn't gone beyond stub-length in the two years since it was created, which supports the idea that it isn't really encyclopedic - no credibly sourced information has been added to the article. The information contained in Jesse Katsopolis is really quite satisfactory as to what is encylopedic, and isn't much shorter than this entire article, so there won't be much loss of content. bwowen ^{talk•contribs} 02:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete fictional topics have to receive real world coverage for them to be notable - Nothing established/found for this Corpx 02:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The information is trivial at best. Calgary 03:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Iknowyourider (t c) 03:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Bucketsofg 03:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. @pple 04:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No real world coverage, trivial information. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 04:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with Full House and/or Jesse Katsopolis. Bands that only exist on TV shows don't merit their own articles. Blueboy96 15:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.