Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry (racehorse)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 04:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jerry (racehorse)

Jerry (racehorse) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Nonnotable and very little content. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 09:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, I guess, although I'm not sure what the notability criteria for horses are. The Grand National is apparently "the biggest betting race in the United Kingdom," so winning it seems fairly notable. "Very little content" is not necessarily a reason to delete -- mark it as a stub instead. Zagalejo 20:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep, racehorses are athletes and running in the Grand National is surely competing at the top level per WP:BIO. See also the several blue-linked articles at Grand_National#1836-1849. --Dhartung | Talk 21:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, the Grand National is one of the very few horse races with general name recognition in the UK, and can reasonably be seen as the pinnacle of horse achievement. Would suggest that all Grand National winners are notable. Eludium-q36 11:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per the convincing arguments made above. RFerreira 19:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.