Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeroen bours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article at present reads in a way which was brought up by the 'delete' !voters, and yet not countered by the 'keep' !voters. Although the referencing begins to try and fix the problem, consensus still lies with 'delete'. I'll be happy to provide the references for the deleted version to anyone who asks. Daniel Bryant 08:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jeroen bours

Jeroen bours (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Biography with a spammy tone, appropriately since this guy is a creative person in advertising. Written by user:Jeroenbours. Notable? -- RHaworth 02:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as transparent COI (noted by RHaworth) and general vanity tone. YechielMan 05:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. I added some references, including Fortune magazine and the New York Times. --Eastmain 07:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep with current references, but nonetheless beware of the WP:COI. - SpLoT // 12:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete COI, lets someone else create the page. From the sources you couldn't even establish all the claims made in this article.--Dacium 22:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Dacium, the page can later be recreated. --Phoenix (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.