The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:07, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Unverifiable vanity, nn. Not quite Speedy because of claim of leadership? Dlyons493Talk 21:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion This is a nonsense vanity page. Bwithh 01:12, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete as self-contradictory hoax. --Metropolitan90 03:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity --Rogerd 03:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Strong Delete clearly a rubbish post, get rid of it -JvHowell
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.