This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:04, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable identical twins. Article claims notability in terms of their usefulness to biologists and geneticists but Google says not. I think the game is given away by the comment about their looks. Dbiv 22:39, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. —Korath (Talk) 03:35, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Mikkalai 08:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, possible delusions of grandeur, no exceptional claim for notability. Average Earthman 14:05, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. A WP test. Gtabary 10:48, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.