Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Wyatt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jeremy Wyatt

Jeremy Wyatt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I'm not sure that the subject of this article is notable and the references listed don't seem to help the case for notability at all. I also don't seem to see any information about this person when I search online, but I may just not be doing a good job of looking. If someone else can find more info, please do. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - The prose and layout can easily be cleaned up but unfortunately there is nothing I can find which you make the subject notable enough for an article at this time. -- EhsanQ (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Please dont delete artists on here they shape culture among the masses. Most Artists dont achieve any of this until they die . I own a 1930 painting by American Artist Sela Paisley valued at over $15,000 and you'll probably never find anything from her online either , we are still in the fetal ages of the internet. Please leave everything posted on here alone for the future masses. Dont delete this page for my elementary page design skills ! Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankie Babylon (talk • contribs) The unsigned comment was added while blanking the rest of the discussion page. Restored by -- saberwyn 04:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keeping this article is not a matter of design or spreading the truth. The contents of the article must be proven/verifiable through the use of reliable, in-depth sources discussing the subject. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, reliable sources, and the guidelines for inclusion in relation to notability of biographies, specifically for still-living persons. Also, repeatedly blanking the discussion page and pasting a plea to "shape culture among the masses" will not paint you in a favourable light with other users. -- saberwyn 05:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as a patent hoax. ("Destroyed in the chipmunk fire"?). Could probably be A7'd but may as well let the AFD run. — iridescent 05:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. non notable.--Celtus (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete either as a hoax or non-notable. DGG (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No sources anywhere, the three links in the article have nothing to do with the subject. Almso certainly a hoax:"He has been spotted there on several saturday afternoons high on medicinal marijuana soaking up the sun on his stretch beach cruiser." Yeah, right. Somebody is trying make a joke, not very successfully. Nsk92 (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, no WP:RS, fails WP:BIO and is very likely a WP:HOAX etc...etc....so tagged.--Pmedema (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Note Speedy tag removed by User:Wknight94 stating "rm speedy. Let's let the AFD run". --Pmedema (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete moronic. JuJube (talk) 03:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete It's hard to get less notable than this. Edward321 (talk) 05:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7, absolutely no assertion of notability. A lot of notable people are mentioned in the article but their connection with Wyatt is tenuous to nonexistent and in any case notability is not determined by how many famous people one has a connection with. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • comment It does seem to be very hard to include contemporary artists and other people associated with art on wikipedia unless they have been in the New York Times. An artist can be very notable in the mainstream art community but not considered notable by the general public and I think that has caused a lot of great content to be booted from this site. However, I've not seen any additions to this bio that warrant a keep vote. It can be even harder for people notable in the underground art scene. I'm not going to vote yet. I'm going to give the person working on it a chance to cite more information. Has this artist been mentioned in any underground art publications? (Roodhouse1 (talk) 03:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC))
  • Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 17:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.