Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Weate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. --Titoxd^(?!?) 02:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jeremy Weate

Vanity, 1,000 google hits. Skrewler 01:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• • Comment - this was an orphaned AFD. Now listed properly. Eddie.willers 01:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Femmina 01:46, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep if verified. Forget the blog: the book is verified, and that is a tremendous number of hits for a philosophy popularizer. Geogre 02:55, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete 1,000 hits is a low number of google hits for a philosophy popularizer who claims notability. No indication of notability. Mr. Weate also lists Consultancy as his profession on his blog. Bwithh 03:53, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep To help work against systemic bias. For someone working in philosophy from Africa that's a lot of hits. He's also published scholarly papers Achille Mbembe and the Postcolony: Going beyond the Text in Research in African Literatures and Postcolonial theory on the brink: a critique of Achille Mbembe's On the Postcolony in African Identities. That would be below my bar on an American/European academic but I'd keep this. Dlyons493 Talk 10:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Dlyons493 and for Young Person's Guide to Philosophy, available in many school and public libraries. - squibix 15:50, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per WP:BIO as author of widely published and reviewed book. Capitalistroadster 16:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep marginal but systemic bias argument is persuasive in this case. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 18:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep author listed on amazon with a popular title. --Quiddity 04:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per the verifications above. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per, um, everyone. Good research, guys. Jacqui^★ 15:05, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Why was this targeted as part of the The war on blogs? The blog link is incidental. He is writing and publishing in a country where 1% of the country has internet access. Google is not likely to be an accurate measure of his notability. As above, this is a great example of systemic bias. mennonot 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.