Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Moulton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no prejudice against creating a redirect. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jeremy Moulton

Jeremy Moulton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination. The article had been redirected to Southampton; other than that being the city where Mr Moulton is from, there seems no sensible reason for this. He is not even mentioned in the Southampton article! If the person is believed to be non-notable, then this should be discussed by the community. RFBailey (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete, well below WP:POLITICIAN. Local councillors are rarely notable. --Dhartung | Talk 00:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • KeepWeak Keep - The subject of article appears to be notable. He is referenced by reliable third party sources.See[1], :[2]and
[3]. I don't see a problem with WP:V or WP:NOTABLE. I don't see why this is at AfD and I do not understand a procedural nomination?! Nk.sheridan   Talk 00:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment Changed my opinion to weak keep after reading WP:POLITICIAN. Nk.sheridan   Talk 23:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as failing WP:BIO in the absence of significant press coverage. I'm not finding any with Google or Google News. Deor (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Borderline delete - This guy seems like he's right at the brink of notability. One or two more sources (which I can't find) would put him over the top. However, at the moment, I believe he does not meet WP:BIO. TN‑X-Man 04:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • WP:BIO requires sigificant coverage. Therefore, one or two more sources will never decide the notability of a person. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No significant coverage. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Google News Archive and NewsUK between them turn up three articles quoting him, but none saying anything about him. Not clearly more notable than any other UK councillor. EALacey (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable, after reading the deletion guidelines I noted that a redirect is favoured over a deletion (because the information is kept and can be used should notability increase) but if there is a choice then I would rather have the article deleted as this councillor has done nothing of note yet. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.