Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Duggan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep per Tony Sidaway.--Sean Black ^(talk) 20:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeremiah Duggan

Delete. This persons death might be fit for an obit. But the person is not notable enough to warrant an entire article. It does not meet Wikipedia standards. It was created it seems to discredit Lyndon LaRouche - which no matter your opinion of this politician does not warrant this article. IAMthatIAM 17:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This is pro-LaRouche vandalism, and I've removed the AfD tag. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Potentially an edit war between a new user IAMthatIAM, and the original creator of the page SlimVirgin. See also the comments made by an apparently good faith editor here: NathanDW. I have absolutely no idea where to go with this one, but I'm putting back the AfD tag so that the discussion will not be stifled. Slowmover 17:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This is not an edit war. It's a LaRouche activist with a new account trying to cause trouble. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• I rarely say speedy keep, but this is a prime example. Duggan's death and the circumstances surrounding it made international news (BBC, Washington Post). This is not a case for deletion, or merging, or anything else. It's a rather complete article. Perhaps it needs some editing, but Wikipedia is a work in progress. --Tony Sidaway 17:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.