Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeph pawn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 02:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeph pawn

• Keep I have heard of Jeph Pawn, I have The Second Album, so does an exchange student from Osaka, Japan, at my homestay. Ivan Pineda and Anthony Blinoff are still fairly well known in Sydney so I would not dismiss this entry. -DC_Johanson.

Band history totally unverifiable, a hoax MNewnham 21:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable. If we get sources and references I could be convinced to change. Stifle 01:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per Stifle -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 05:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable band, no hits on allmusic.com. This information needs to have its sources cited for a start, as the text of the article is not suitable for research. This would be more appropriate on a tribute website than on WP. -- (aeropagitica)  07:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. And if their album "achieved success" in the US, why has Amazon not heard of it? Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as functionally unverifiable. Not found on the usual suspects. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable (as above). Ajwebb 22:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I have The Second Album, so its obviously not all just smoke. -KelvinDougherty

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.