Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Maggs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jennifer Maggs

Jennifer Maggs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Sociologist of questionable notability. Article apparently started as a joke ("Jennifer plays the clarinet") and was later changed and expanded by another user... a bit confused as to how legit this really could be. My theory is that the original user could've been writing an article about themselves, someone else Googled the name and found another person by the very same name, and decided to change the article to fit the bill. Throwing this to the community for a wider assessment. --Czj 02:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Doesn't meet WP:N. janejellyroll 02:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources, no context, no notability. Ganfon 03:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless additional sources supplied. Can be kept or reinstated if evidence of notability is provided. She's a real person and the article is legit for the little it says, see [1], so anything that happened in the past shouldn't affect our discussion. For all I know she may be notable, but there isn't currently any evidence she is. --Shirahadasha 04:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Here's some additional information: a bibliography [2]. 483 ghits for "jennifer maggs", 279 for "jennifer l maggs". --Shirahadasha 05:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete, looks nn to me. Sorry. Lankiveil 05:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete or properly source and cite Alf photoman 15:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Perhaps her bibliography should be listed first, having a chance to turn this to a half-decent stub. As it is the article has no seeming merits. User:Dimadick
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.