Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Lopez (meteorologist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 04:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jennifer Lopez (meteorologist)

nn Will (Glaciers melting in the dead of night) 13:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. According to Wikipedia precedent, anybody on TV is important. If she were fictional, she'd be even more important. Billy Blythe 15:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
    • There is no such precedent. Instead of citing a nonexistent precedent, please instead explain how this person satisfies our WP:BIO criteria. Uncle G 15:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:BIO. —dustmite 15:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)After further research, I recant. Weak keep as she is a familiar face on a major network. —dustmite 00:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
    Comment Just because someone fails WP:BIO, it doesn't mean an article on the person should automatically be deleted. There must be room for exceptions here. Morover, WP:BIO is a guideline, which means that there is more room for exceptional cases (unlike policies). Various other factors have to be taken into consideration as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. She's on tv for a significant time. I think that makes her notable. Green caterpillar 16:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Prominent face on a national cable network. Fan-1967 17:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • keep please passes bio as prominent face on national cable network for significant time Yuckfoo 20:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't be fooled by the rocks that I got...Keep as on-air personality on a national network. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
  • Weak Keep She has been awarded with the AMS Seal of Approval and has been on television for a considerable period of time (since 2000). Moreover, the weather channel is a well known television network. The information in the article is also verifiable as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above comments. RFerreira 05:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep though I disagree that in AfD's "anybody on TV is important". Arbusto 02:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.