Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenn brown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as copyvio even after editing. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jenn brown
Doesn't meet WP:BIO. Article's tone is such that I really want to speedy it per CSD G11. -- Merope 20:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ---Charles 20:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - The shows are legitimate, as (apparently) are Brown's roles in them (although I'd never heard of HD Net), but I don't see the notability. I'm also concerned that this may be a single purpose account which always makes me uneasy. As to the speedy, I'd hold off on that and let concensus decide. -bobby 21:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The article as is is bona fide crap, but if the claim is true, it should obviously be rewritten to read more like an encyclopedia article. Danny Lilithborne 21:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment All information is true. Please advise how to make article more acceptable to Wikipedia's standards. Thank you.
- Reply - Hi Brownie1212! In the future, please use ~~~~ to sign and date your posts. The issue with your article's deletion isn't factual accuracy (in my mind) but notability. Please read over the guidelines qualifying an individual for inclusion and see if Jenn brown fits them. Also, based on your user name, it sounds as if you might not be the best editor to write an unbiased article on Ms. Brown. My advice is to wait until Jenn achieves the requisite notability, and then I'm sure her followers will get an article up here pretty quickly. Hope this helps. -bobby 21:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply Thank you for your response and help, I very much appreciate it. This is all so very new to me and I was just intersted in seeing what this very interesting website was all about. If the powers that be feel this is not sutible for your site, then I am sure that is what is best as they would know. The article was created directly from Jenn's website's Bio page. Maybe there is a better format...or maybe she just needs to have someone that is more familiar with your site submit her. Thanks again. Brownie1212 22:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reply - Hi Brownie1212! In the future, please use ~~~~ to sign and date your posts. The issue with your article's deletion isn't factual accuracy (in my mind) but notability. Please read over the guidelines qualifying an individual for inclusion and see if Jenn brown fits them. Also, based on your user name, it sounds as if you might not be the best editor to write an unbiased article on Ms. Brown. My advice is to wait until Jenn achieves the requisite notability, and then I'm sure her followers will get an article up here pretty quickly. Hope this helps. -bobby 21:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Does not seem notable, but should this end as a keep, I would suggest that whole chunks of it are edited out to get down to the really important stuff (if there is any). Emeraude 22:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete tag added for Copy vio from http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=376210. (The bloody myspace page plays music when you load. The text is in a box toward the upper middle.) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 23:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Retyped press release pretending to be an article. Auto movil 23:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
