Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenn Gotzon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jenn Gotzon

Jenn Gotzon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Now, I could be completely wrong here, but there are too many inconsistencies with this article. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of actors could investigate further. My concerns are as follows: Firstly, this article was created by User:Isoparm on 5 July 2006; this user has made no other contributions. Secondly, in the Wikipedia articles on the films she is claimed to have starred in - Derailed and Hulk (film) - make no mention of her. Thirdly, her entry at IMDb was written by.....Jenn Gotzon. I have no experience of IMDb, but it appears to me that it is freely editable, and therefore unreliable. Fourthly, using IMDb to follow up some of the films she appears to have been in shows a marked difference with the Wikipedia entries (e.g. Derailed stated to be directed and written by Albert Pedraza whereas Wikipedia says Mikael Håfström and Stuart Beattie . All of this leads me to think that both IMDb and Wikipedia are being used to promote the 'career' of a minor or non-existant actor. Emeraude 10:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete the person does exist, per jenngotzon.com, but this page would probably have to be deleted per CSD G11 (blatant advertising). No real assertion of notability, and IMDb does not count as a reliable source, so therefore this should be deleted. --SunStar Net talk 14:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete No major roles in IMDB - mostly an extra. How much notability should we give to that award ? Corpx 17:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete as per Corpx. We need to see some real cites, perhaps reviews? Bearian 00:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.