Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey C. Wynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep `'mikka (t) 18:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeffrey C. Wynn

No real significance. It seems like a person's resume. Red dwarf 01:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Keep per below. Royboycrashfan 01:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep a Scientific American article (circulation >5000), two patents and 220 articles, books (Amazon has 14) and papers seems to meet WP:BIO requirements. The article needs to have its POV/vanity elements editied down, but he seems notable. Gwernol 01:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Gwernol. Those 14 books does it for me. --Lockley 01:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Gwernol Leidiot 02:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Gwernol ConDem^Talk 03:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Per above. Cnwb 06:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Gwernol --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. But for heaven's sake, stop calling him "Jeff." ProhibitOnions 09:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Gwernol. --Terence Ong 10:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, clearly notable. Monicasdude 14:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep not all notable people have to be in the form of an action figure or bobblehead. --Jay(Reply) 23:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Shhh. Don't tempt the bobblemakers Kuru ^talk 04:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, meets [WP:BIO] per above. Kuru ^talk 04:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, `'mikka (t) 18:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.