Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Vail

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 19:27, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Vail

Probably not notable. The book is published by a vanity press, so it doesn't count towards notability. I find it a bit suspicious that all the 5 reviews at amazon have given the book 5/5 stars. Thue | talk 10:08, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete NN. Book is not in the Library of Congress or the British Library. Only significant google hits appear to be references to blog entries. David | Talk 14:52, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Utter dreck and vanity. His blog is the same; self-involved garbage. 216.158.31.195 16:52, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. Nice of him to give himself 5/5 on Amazon. --Etacar11 18:06, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 04:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.