Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff See

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff See

• Delete Jeff See is not of an elite status. There are many other college runners that have had better success in running than him (in college and high school). Sharpdust 00:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agreed. Non-notable. --Jay(Reply) 00:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn't quite meet WP:BIO. After breaking Alan Webb's sophomore record, his performance did not continue on the same pace[1]. In his freshman cross country season, he was 22nd in his regional meet and in the "Top 100" in the NCAA [2]. —ERcheck @ 01:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO. PJM 02:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:BIO as far as I'm concerned. He was notable for a period of time and shouldn't have to maintain it. --Cymsdale 12:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now, since there is no evidence of genuine notability. This could change, which is fine. We have no need to scoop anybody, let's wait and see if he's still "famous" when the 15 minutes are up. Just zis Guy you know? 13:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong 15:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unremarkable. -- Krash (Talk) 22:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.