Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Forshaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. DS 16:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Forshaw

Delete, Smacks of pure vanity. claim about nobel prize nomination is unverifiable as nominations are secret for 50 years. other than that, nothing else can make this fellow more than an ordinary physicist. Montco 02:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete vanity page - Green Giant 02:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Tony Bruguier 02:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Sounds like a cool guy, but this is vanity. DarthVader 04:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Was speedied under another name [1], IIRC, I was the one who tagged it, and I believe it was complete bullocks. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 04:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 04:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom Nortelrye 05:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As an alumnus of that university department, I can confirm that this guy is non-notable. Oldelpaso 11:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't believe this is vanity. It reads like a send-up of the guy. It's material taken from his university website page, apart from the Nobel Prize bit, and this:

"The following is taken from Jeff's website in his own words, listen to the genius."

That doesn't sound like the subject of the article talking. It sounds like a disaffected student. Tyrenius 14:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.