Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Britting (Jeff Britting nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Sandstein 23:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Britting

Jeff Britting (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • delete. This is the second nomination. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Britting for prior vote. This gentleman, while being an associate producer and having edited one book, has not done anything definitive and does not meet wp:bio or wp:author as best as i can judge using google. The author of this new version does add some citations, but book reviews and small articles don't count much for me. Buridan 00:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Bahhhh, I munged this somehow.... need better directions for a second nomination:(--Buridan 00:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment the article history appears to indicate the nominator has withdrawn this AfD, is this correct? Addhoc 12:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
the nomination was munged, and the bot overwrote the old nomination linked above, so i removed it from the page. --Buridan 15:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Addhoc 16:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (o rly?) 17:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, author of a NYT-reviewed bookbehind paywall. LRB review here.--Dhartung | Talk 20:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, between the book and the movie and the sources, I'd say he's notable. Recury 15:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep but work on this article or we will have it back in a month or so Alf photoman 15:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.