Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Ginn Marvin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 18:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jean Ginn Marvin
non notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minorrules (talk • contribs) 2007/05/20 21:06:13
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
*Delete. Seeing as User:Agmarvin is the only contributor to this article, I would say that the person who wrote the article may have a conflict of interest. Furthermore, the article seems to fail WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per my own impulsivity. (I need to stop!) Definitely passes muster now. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Plenty of GHits that appear to be legitimate. Has held notable offices. Clarityfiend 05:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. As a person who held statewide office, she is presumptively notable under WP:BIO, and there are reliable sources cited in the article to substantiate her career. She ran in a statewide election, held office for six years and still serves on a major commission; she is certainly the subject of significant coverage in multiple sources.--Kubigula (talk) 03:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Kubigula. As a state rep for 6 years, she's notable. Being an innkeeper in Kennebunkport doesn't quite cut it, but we can probably throw that line out. YechielMan 13:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.