Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeafrel bahian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Dunc|☺ 17:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jeafrel bahian

No evidence of notability. Delete. JeremyA 4 July 2005 04:05 (UTC)

• Delete - Vanity. Rocky July 4, 2005 05:34 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Fernando Rizo 4 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)
• Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 05:47 (UTC)
• Delete - Vanity. --Eliezer 4 July 2005 05:49 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity JoJan 4 July 2005 07:55 (UTC)
• Delete Isn't "non-notable" a sufficient cause for speedy deletion? If not, why not? --Wetman 4 July 2005 09:28 (UTC)
  • Nominators may fail to establish existing notability on a subject outside their field of interest when the article's subject is in fact notable. Also, non-notable could be abused as a reason to get stuff speedied if we did use it as such. - Mgm|^(talk) July 4, 2005 10:26 (UTC)
    • Precisely. I agree that no one person should be able to speedy an NN or vanity page, but it might be reasonable to expand the Speedy procedure to cover personal or band vanity articles after three or four Speedy or Delete votes in VfD. I probably belong in the CSD expansion discussion about now, so yeah. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 12:33 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity. - Mgm|^(talk) July 4, 2005 10:26 (UTC)
• Delete, NN vanity. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 12:33 (UTC)
• Delete, I agree. Oliver Keenan July 4, 2005 19:07 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.