Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay R. Grodner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BLP & WP:NOT#NEWS. PeaceNT (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jay R. Grodner

Jay R. Grodner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't meet notability standards -- in the truest sense, a petty criminal; I suspect this is a WP:COATRACK for some sort of political agenda which I don't fully understand. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Vandalism described as a "violent" crime? Why do these things always have such an air of defensiveness? This is a blog cause celebre that has received limited coverage even locally, and fails WP:BLP1E as well as any kind of basic significance test. --Dhartung | Talk 05:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable petty criminal. Lankiveil (talk) 07:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC).
  • Delete - as per nom. Minor thug. Xdenizen (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP - This case has made a dent in the public lexicon. The cultural effect alone should merit this article STAYING in the Wikipedia -- Wayagrrrl — Wayagrrrl (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • KEEP! Mr. Grodner has made himself famous, and should be able to take whatever criticism that might result from his actions! http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/keyedcar.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.71.3.6 (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP. Why would you delete this page on Grodner? Because he's a anti war lawyer? Deleting this would be typical left wing fascist censorship, so typical of Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.113.11 (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP - multiple secondary sources including article in the chicago tribune. appears to meet notability requirements. Warfieldian (talk) 11:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.