Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javed Bolah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 21:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Javed Bolah

Javed Bolah (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Procedural nomination; article was prodded, deleted, restored with message "15 revisions restored: contested prod" (?), reprodded, and deprodded (by me). Taking it to AfD to sort it out. Jfire (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Jfire (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. No sources provided after being tagged with "unreferenced" for 12 months. If no reliable sources can be found (and I couldn't) the article should be deleted as failing WP:N. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 01:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I deleted and restored the article after being asked to do so. I also told the user that he/she should add references. If added, the article can be kept, otherwise deleted again. --Tone 14:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 22:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. This article has had its chances and no one has stepped forward. A quick search makes me believe it is non notable. --Stormbay (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing in any language although I'd reckon a guess that there are a number of African papers which haven't made Google. Travellingcari (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.