Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason hogg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. There are four delete votes counting the nominator, and at most two to keep, one of which is doubtful. Postdlf 03:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jason hogg

Vanity. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:15, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Not a particularly notable person. --Sgkay 22:34, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Vanity, non-notable. Quale 23:14, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Claim to fame: "Program Manager for Microsoft on the patterns & practices team." Samaritan 23:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Program Manager for Enterprise Development Reference Architecture (formerly codenamed Shadowfax). This is a major part of Microsoft's distributed network service strategy. He's not just some Dilbert, though he bears an uncanny resemblance to him. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Move. Needs to be at "Jason Hogg" not "Jason hogg". --Commander Keane 09:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree with this recommendation. Does this amount to a keep vote? --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • When EDRA reaches mainstream notability as the distributed disservice whose security failures or standards-breaking caused the Great Windows Crash of 2006, that might make Jason Hogg WP-worthy if he's still program manager or if he's blamed in Congressional hearings. Until then, no, not every department head at every big corporation needs an article of two or three sentences here. And one who is individually notable should have his surname's initial capitalized. Delete as first choice, move as Keane mentioned only if article bio-stub is kept. Barno 14:54, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.