Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Cherniak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jason Cherniak

Jason Cherniak (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This looks like a vanity page for a blogger Watchsmart 01:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete None notable person/vanity--M8v2 03:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - His main claim to fame seems to be "While there has never been controversy over whether he should edit his own Wikipedia article, current policy allows him to and he has" - That pretty much says it all right there... Wickethewok 07:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Probably shouldn't be editing his own article with self-references to Wikipedia policy, but the second paragraph appears to contain at least one notable position he held. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - autobiography, check history. MER-C 12:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:BIO and disagree that any of the positions held oare of sufficient note. -- Whpq 17:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. - Triviaa 19:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non notable person. Bearly541 23:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Claim to fame is that he is a blogger who edited his own Wikipedia article. Article in its current state is either a personal attack or the most ridiculous form of self-promotion I've seen yet. Wavy G 01:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. His blog has received several recent mentions in The Globe and Mail and other Canadian national media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.173.222.175 (talk)
• Keep per Mgm. Sharkface217 05:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Also, the use of the word "vanity" in AFD discussions is now discouraged. Please instead use "conflict of interest" per WP:COI. NeoJustin 22:03, 7 December 2006
• Delete vanity :P Danny Lilithborne 22:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.