Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese people in Hong Kong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as nominator retracted reason for AfD. (aeropagitica) 20:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Japanese people in Hong Kong
Not a notable topic. No notable or reputable sources of information found either. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment Nomination retracted due to User:CaliforniaAliBaba's edits. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete • per nom - The RSJ ¿Qué? 23:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Huwe 6 04:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep found two academic papers on them in about 5 minutes of googling. Also a visit to the HK Census/Stats Department website gave a population figure, which I added to the article. Will continue expanding. cab 05:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Woh! Good job on the expansion there. In light of your additions, I'm retracting my nomination. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If this were done for every nationality in every major city, the result would be ludicrous.ERTalk 07:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it's now well sourced and of a reasonable length. The before and after diff shows quite an improvement. Good job CaliforniaAliBaba. Picaroon 01:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Yomanganitalk 17:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This article has been expanded considerably since it was put up for AfD, and since it has been submitted for "Did You Know?" it would be good to get some more opinions, so the AfD can be closed before it becomes ineligible for DYK. Yomanganitalk 17:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Very well-referenced. --- RockMFR 17:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and give User:CaliforniaAliBaba a cookie for expanding the article. ColourBurst 19:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.