Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese bao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Japanese bao

Japanese bao (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unsourced one liner, basically a WP:DICDEF, with no indication why it's important/notable. Carlossuarez46 23:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Transwiki to wiktionary as it is essentially a dictionary definition. TonyBallioni 23:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The syllable "bao" doesn't even appear in Japanese, no idea what this thing is talking about. If it were about a real object with a real name, it might be expandable from a dicdef (who invented it, what materials it requires, what are the major centres of manufacture), but this isn't. cab 00:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. cab 00:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless this is properly sourced. Right now it seems like a mistake or a hoax. --Dhartung | Talk 00:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - As per comment above, it is either a mistake or hoax, as it does not appear in dictionaries or Google as a hair accessory. --DAJF 01:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete apparent hoax --Polaron | Talk 03:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Misprint for "boa"? Fg2 21:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.