Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese Internment camps-positive connotations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 04:24Z

[edit] Japanese Internment camps-positive connotations

Japanese Internment camps-positive connotations (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

NPOV violation without any previous good versions. Nick—Contact/Contribs 02:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete seems a little incoherant. Artw 02:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete does this need explanation? Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 04:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy deleteall of the euphemisms for Japanese American internment are already covered in the Japanese American Internment article. "Positive connotations" doesn't even describe euphemism accurately. This is redundant, and makes no sense.-MsHyde 04:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, blatant POV rant. Edeans 04:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've never appreciated line breaks and capitalization as much as I do now.Natalie 04:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete POV fork and doesnt seem to be a serious attempt at article.. Bwithh 04:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Nonsensical and incoherent rant. Orderinchaos78 09:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • delete as a OR, unsourced rant. Cornell Rockey 16:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as a patent nonsense rant. In the alternative, delete as an POV original research rant.-- danntm T C 18:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per danntm GabrielF 01:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 06:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per patent nonsense, and WP:SNOW - Neier 06:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete and also a probable CSD-G10 attack page. Dekimasuが... 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as above. MightyAtom 06:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.