Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japan Hiroshima Mission

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 19:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Japan Hiroshima Mission

Japan Hiroshima Mission (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is about one of the 344 missions of the LDS Church. General article Mission (LDS Church) exists, but there is no reason to believe that an individual mission is distinct enough to meet the WP notability guidelines. See WP:ORG —SESmith 04:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Searches do not reveal third-party references for this one mission. Do not redirect to Mission (LDS Church), as there are numerous Christian missions in Hiroshima. --Charlene 05:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - There are no reliable sources cited in the article, and a quick Google search revealed only 215 hits. Fails WP:V. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 05:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - very little info on the Internet. GoldengloveContribs ·Talk 15:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. There appear to be multiple reliable sources. Individual missions could definitely meet the notability guidelines, in the same way that High Schools do, and probably an article should be considered for each of the missions. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 19:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. OK, individual missions can possibly be notable somehow. This one isn't. Clarityfiend 21:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Nominator comment. Agree with comment immediately above. An LDS mission could potentially meet the notability guidelines, especially on historical grounds, but this one clearly doesn't. From the information in the article it has existed for less than a decade (vs. ~175 years for LDS movement) and no notable events involving it are mentioned. -SESmith 23:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.