Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jannock

Jannock (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a stub that was created as a dictionary entry. There exists a Wiktionary entry (Wiktionary:jannock) and the reference and one definition was moved into this entry. The remainder is embellishment on the definition. There is reference to a book called Jannock but neither the book nor author have an entry on Wikipedia; there are no incoming links to the page, indicating that the book is not referenced by other articles. In principle, the title could be used to create an article on the book or be a redirect to the author, but in practice the article as it presently exists is a dictionary definition that is redundant with a Wiktionary entry. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Dicdef, and nothing to transwiki - the wiktionary article seems sufficient. --Dennisthe2 01:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef, book reference appears to be non-notable. –Pomte 07:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.