Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannali East Public School

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:30, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jannali East Public School

I always try to give a measure of kindness to school articles; however, this one is a fairly obvious vanity page (excessive use of "they", etc.). No part of the article seems useful or notable. Deltabeignet 03:42, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• Keep almost all schools, see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments for discussion. Kappa 03:45, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm usually in favour of keeping schools, but not public primary schools with notability somewhere in negative numbers territory. Unless something big has happened there, it's nothing but school vanity. Harro5 04:09, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep pending Wikipedia:Schools resolution. — RJH 05:42, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. JuntungWu 06:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Cleanup needed but schools are notable -CunningLinguist 06:57, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I went to this school, it is rather interesting, I just have not added everything yet, it will be good. Just give it a chance, please, I beg you. -Sam15 08:24, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The article could possibly do with trimming to get rid of trivia and ephemera, but the research is good. You've got a Hansard reference to Barry Collier, NSW Assembly member for Miranda, talking about his visit to the school, so it can hardly be claimed that this is not a notable school: it's been noted! --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Primary school established relatively recently with under 200 students. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I had to rescue this because someone thought schools were speedy delete worthy! BeBop 15:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I've rescued one or two like that lately. It's worth keeping an eye on the deletion log because a couple of admins are rather trigger-happy when it comes to school stubs. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. DS1953 15:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I removed the list of 2003 teachers and the list of sports supervisors. There isn't much left now so Sam15 has some work to do. I am going to start notifying nominators when they put up stuff like this. Too many editors who don't participate in the system are tagging articles and not looking back.   —Teknic^T-M-C 17:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Verifiable and NPOV. DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep schools, see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments. --Unfocused 03:56, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep schools User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 08:04, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Hey, also, why was the list of teachers deleted? It's good. Can I put on a list of the teachers from this year? - User:Sam15

It's not really encyclopedic. The names of the staff members aren't really that important. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:04, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and make room for additional helpings of BEEFSTEW. —RaD Man (talk) 00:49, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No Account 21:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep While not great it does contain information that can be expanded on. Vegaswikian 06:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.