Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janko Prunk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 00:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Janko Prunk

Delete. Vanity. The author apparently wrote about himself. He even put an e-mail in the article [1]. As far as I know he is not notable enough to deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Eleassar my talk 22:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. KHM03 23:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:BIO. Bad ideas 01:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per the professor test. Stifle 23:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Appears to have multiple publications according to Amazon --pgk(talk) 20:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Notable historian in Slovenia (evidence below). Avoid Systemic bias. Sure, the article could use some improvement (to indicate the notability) but that's not a reason to delete. My sources are from the subscription based Factiva.
    • From the Slovenska Tiskovna Agencija (a press agency):
      • 2 December 2005: "The co-chairs of a Slovenian-Croatian commission of historians writing a report on bilateral relations...Slovenian chairman Janko Prunk and Croatian chair Dusan Bilandzic said"
      • 24 June 1998: "The last Yugoslav soldier left the country on 25 October 1991. Slovenia became a United Nations member on 22 May 1992. (source: Janko Prunk: KRATKA ZGODOVINA SLOVENIJE (A Short History of Slovenia), published by Zalozba Grad, 1998)."
    • HINA-CROATIAN NEWS AGENCY
      • 2 December 2005: "The Slovene co-chairman, Janko Prunk, agreed with Bilandzic, adding that good relations..."
    • There a couple of dozen more of these.--Commander Keane 20:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Updated the article With more informations about his works (books) User:Prunk 22:00 15 February 2006
  • Keep, looks notable. Kappa 01:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, needs more work but there are is now plenty of cited material as to why this person is notable --pgk(talk) 22:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.