Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Elaine Adkins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete'. I agree with Mavourneed, there are 93 names on the list of killed patients. I don't think a merge is appropriate in this instance. - Ta bu shi da yu 15:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Janet Elaine Adkins
Delete: Non-notable just for being a patient of Jack Kevorkian. Already listed as such in article. Mavourneen 18:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Jack Kevorkian. Plausible search term. --Dhartung | Talk 18:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- People: there are 93 names on his list of patients. We cannot and definitely should not be picking and choosing, which is what the creator of these four articles (so far) did. They are all either equally notable or non-notable. We can't merge and redirect 93 names, can we??? Come on! Common sense! Mavourneen 18:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- Since when is information invaluable? The creator simply has not yet created articles on the remaining names. That doesn't mean he won't. Articles don't create themselves overnight. In addition, the creator doesn't spend every waking moment of his life in front of his computer editing and creating articles. Jack Kevorkian is an extremely controversial doctor and there are people who research this. Students, psychologists, and medical professionals to name a few. The information listed in these articles will soon be nearly inattainable. These articles have no negative impact on Wikipedia whatsoever. Information, regardless of how arcane, is the basis for Wikipedia's creation. Come on! Common SENSE! Niels0827 15:24, 23 September 2007 CST.
- I'm not entirely sure that you meant to say "invaluable"... - Ta bu shi da yu 15:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Since when is information invaluable? The creator simply has not yet created articles on the remaining names. That doesn't mean he won't. Articles don't create themselves overnight. In addition, the creator doesn't spend every waking moment of his life in front of his computer editing and creating articles. Jack Kevorkian is an extremely controversial doctor and there are people who research this. Students, psychologists, and medical professionals to name a few. The information listed in these articles will soon be nearly inattainable. These articles have no negative impact on Wikipedia whatsoever. Information, regardless of how arcane, is the basis for Wikipedia's creation. Come on! Common SENSE! Niels0827 15:24, 23 September 2007 CST.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
