Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Biehl

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 19:39, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Janet Biehl

A 60's "radical", article does not establish why she is different or stands out from the rest of the "radicals" or how she is notable enough to be placed among the more influential "radicals" of the time, smells a bit o vanity. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 09:09, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Published author, though perhaps of borderline notability. See her Biography and Selected Works. --Smithfarm
• Keep. If you can find out more about her though, send this article through cleanup though, cause this does smell a bit of vanity. ParkingStones 18:12, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Copyright violation see [1] Will report this now.Capitalistroadster 19:11, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep if and when that copyvio is cleaned up. Published author appears notable enough for inclusion. Megan1967 07:28, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.