Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Seta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki and delete. --Ezeu 16:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jana Seta

Untrasnalted Latvian, was at WP:PNT for more than two weeks. No idea if it should be translated, transwikied, or deleted, but if nobody translates it by the end of the AfD, delete. Kusma (討論) 22:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Transwiki to Latvian Wikipedia (I can't tell if it exists there already) —Mets501talk 22:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
    • What is it about? If you suggest transwiki, you seem to think it is notable enough for inclusion in the Latvian Wikipedia. Kusma (討論) 22:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • It seems to be about a map publisher [1] [2], I have no idea if they're notable or not, suggest we Transwiki to lt.wikipedia.org and let them sort it out. --Eivindt@c 00:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete without transwiki. Note that the article begins with a question, which makes me doubt that it is written in encyclopedic style. If English-speakers started writing low-quality English-language articles in foreign-language Wikipedias, I wouldn't want the foreign-lanugage editors to transwiki them to the English Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 03:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Transwiki and Speedy Delete. Let them deal with it there. It's clearly in the wrong place here. Zaxem 04:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • This article is advertising text written in name of company "Jana Seta"; one they would put in a handout page at a local trade show. It definitely should not be kept in wikipedia. Aivars from Latvia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.68.64.2 (talk • contribs)
  • Transwiki to the Latvian Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.