Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Schoen (Dutch philosopher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jan Schoen (Dutch philosopher)

Quite an elaborate and real looking article, but still a hoax none the less. There is no proof of the existance of this person.-- JoanneB 09:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - a pretty good hoax, almost believable. - Richardcavell 10:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless proof is offered. Arbusto 10:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, hoax. --Terence Ong 11:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. PJM 12:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Really wanted to believe it. Not a gsearch in the world could help it. Mystache 13:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-verifiable WP:V.--blue520 13:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Pity the author wouldn't put his undoubted abilities to uses other than vandalism. Dlyons493 Talk 20:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, obvious hoax. Lambiam^Talk 21:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Note for closing admin: please also delete the redirect pages Jan Schone, Jan Schon, Jan Shoen, Jan Schoen. --Lambiam^Talk 21:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wow, sure is a well-constructed hoax --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax. — TheKMan^talk 23:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.