Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Ors
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge (back) to List of minor Star Wars Rebel characters--Tikiwont (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jan Ors
No assertion of real-world notability, no citations to reliable sources even to substantiate the in-universe plot summary. --EEMIV (talk) 04:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect: To the appropriate game's article. Not important/notable enough for an article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect: I agree the article is not notable enough on its own. However, as Jan Ors appears in several games in Jedi Knights series of game as well as various references in Star Wars novels, a merge per Rjd0060 is probably not the best course. I would suggest a merge to list of minor Star Wars Rebel characters. Showers (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Seems Jan Ors is already listed in list of minor Star Wars Rebel characters. Perfect for a merge Showers (talk) 23:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: I actually came to this article to find out what else Jan Ors was in. I don't follow the extended universe but I did play dark forces 1 & 2. Ryan4314 (talk) 02:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - "It is useful" is not a compelling argument to keep an article. --EEMIV (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as there is no justifiable reason to keep this plot summary. There are no verifiable citations to identify the primary source, and no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate real-world notability. Overall, this article fails WP guidelines by many parsecs.--Gavin Collins (talk) 08:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
