Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamocklaquat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jamocklaquat

insufficient importance CleanSweeper 04:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable with only 69 unique Google results [1], though I'm also fine with a redirect to Lego--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 04:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I doubt a specific model, let alone an unimportant one, would make a good redirect. Royboycrashfan 06:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. —This unsigned comment was added by 202.67.127.214 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 28 March 2006.
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an AFOL I can tell you that even amongst the Lego hobby community this is considered unimportant. TimGould
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 15:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete One model alone does not constitiue enough content nor importance to have a full page. Maybe this can be included as a footnote somewhere else...?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.