Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Price

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per general guidelines found at WP:BIO. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jamie Price

Jamie Price (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Has not made an appearance in a fully professional league, so fails WP:BIO. robwingfield «T•C» 17:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

  • This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. robwingfield «T•C» 17:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Fuck It Off - has not appeared in a professional game and doesn't deserve to grace the world of Wikipedia, so lets get rid of it. End discussion here please, we all know the outcome. My suggestion is to burn this page!!! Thanks! Jonesy702 (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. пﮟოьεԻ 57 18:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. (Looks like Jonesy is testy today). Alexf42 18:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - what the hell is this fruit cake on about, testy? Jonesy702 (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I wouldn't give two shits to be completely honest, but what's that got to do with anything? I never told anyone to fuck off. Jonesy702 (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • My bad, I misread your comment. " what the hell is this fruit cake on about, testy?" borders on an attack; please be a little more civil. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Was that an apology there? come on now, you can do better than that! lol. I don't believe my fruit cake comment was offensive, but if Alexf did, I am truly sorry, and promise it will never ever happen again. :-) Jonesy702 (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Been called worse by vandals. Wouldn't have the mop without a thick hide. Still don't get what are you upset about. Anyway there are more important things to do. Alexf42 21:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Did I miss something where we stopped using the new criteria right away? He played a game for Tamworth, which I believe is a professional side. matt91486 (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
    Comment - Doesn't count for shit unfortunatly buddy, although Tamworth are professional, the Conference National is only semi, because of a handful of teams. Jonesy702 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Aren't you a little profane today? About a week ago, the WikiProject made new notability criteria analyzing a team's professional status instead of by entire league. And unless this criteria has already been scrapped, making the whole exercise in making it kind of pointless, then he would meet it. matt91486 (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I think it is clear by now that the general community disagrees with the project's criteria. But they can certainly try to set their specialized rules, and then see if they are accepted. These are not. DGG (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - the notability guidelines are obviously meant only to prevent people from creating articles about their best friend who happens to play football for some Isthmian Premier League side. Keeping that in mind, why not lean towards the inclusionist side rather than the deletionist side of things? ugen64 (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment - the notability bar has to be set at a certain level, which has been set by the community at "Competitors and coaches who have competed in a fully professional league" (taken from [[WP:BIO). This has been established by previous AFDs to mean, for footballers in England, that the player must have made a league appearance in Football League Two or higher. This player has only played in the Football Conference, and so therefore is not notable. If he were to go on to make a professional appearance, the article can be undeleted. robwingfield «T•C» 07:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.