Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Loiselle

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:23, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jamie Loiselle

This page is either a vanity page or patent nonsense. The owner reverted my CSD so I'm bringing it up for a VfD Shoaler 14:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Concur with vanity. Technically it is not "patent nonsense" since that refers to random characters such as "goshgøioshgoøirdh". Sjakkalle 14:57, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
  • There is another category of articles that are considered patent nonsense: those that are well-formed, but make absolutely no sense. As an example, see the entry "Binary pulsar" on my user page. --Carnildo 23:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Obvious vanity. In fact, I'm going to speedy delete it right now. --khaosworks 14:59, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hm. For some reason I'm getting an error. Marking it with {{delete}} again so someone else can handle it. --khaosworks 15:06, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

• I speedied it successfully but most likely it will be back. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.